URL:https://dosomething-a.akamaihd.net /sites/default/files/styles/550x300/public/ images/pollution.jpg?itok=8hztq0jE |
Rachel Carson’s
“The Obligation to Endure” discusses the negative impact that the human race
has had on our natural world. “Only within the moment of time represented by
the present century has one species—man—acquired significant power to alter the
nature of his world” (Carson 153). I completely agree with Carson in the fact
that man has indeed destroyed much of our natural world in trying to control
it. In an attempt to make ourselves comfortable with all of our luxuries such
as most transportation, restaurants, factories, and power plants we are
polluting the air, water and the earth in general. For the most part all of the
pollution we are creating is irreversible. We cannot simply go outside with
some contraption and rid the earth of all the chemicals we have launched into
our atmosphere and lodged into our soil. Not only do these toxins penetrate our
world over time they also make their way into living organisms making them sick
and potentially, if lethal enough, causing death.
URL:http://www.marywood.edu/ dotAsset/faca368b-97e2-4541-aef3-58e1749f9419.jpg |
“The crusade to
create a chemically sterile, insect-free world seems to have engendered a
fanatic zeal on the part of many specialists and most of the so-called control
agencies” (Carson 159). I do not believe this statement to be true. Specialists
put in charge of these control agencies know what has to be done and how it has
to be done. These people understand how our world works and how it must
maintain homeostasis and wiping out different species is not how you achieve
that. I know there are some people who believe that wiping out entire species
won’t affect much of anything as far as the natural order is concerned, but
these people are not the specialists. Specialists look for ways to keep
everything on earth comfortable, they do not lean in one way or the other and
will definitely not knock out an entire species for the sake of human comfort.
URL:http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/ anthropology-in-practice/files/ 2013/07/4649802150_8164dc68ca.jpg |
“I am saying,
rather, that control must be geared into realities, not to mythical situations,
and that the methods employed must be such that they do not destroy us along
with the insects” (Carson 156). This statement that Carson makes is a bit
confusing to me. How could control be geared into a mythical situation? It
either is controlled or it is not controlled there really is no other option. Also,
I do not believe that destroy is the best word to use in this case. The whole point
of this is to have a healthy balance between the insects and the human
population, not wipe out the entirety of one or the other. Control is the key
word here, we are simply attempting to control some of the insect population so
both humans and the insects can live in harmony.
No comments:
Post a Comment